ABSTRACT
Background. Excessive inspiratory effort could translate into self-inflicted lung injury, thus worsening clinical outcomes of spontaneously breathing patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Although esophageal manometry is a reliable method to estimate the magnitude of inspiratory effort, procedural issues significantly limit its use in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study is to describe the correlation between esophageal pressure swings (ΔPes) and nasal (ΔPnos) as a potential measure of inspiratory effort in spontaneously breathing patients with de novo ARF. Methods. From January 1st, 2021 to September 1st, 2021, 61 consecutive patients with ARF (83.6% related to COVID-19) admitted to the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit (RICU) of the University Hospital of Modena (Italy) and candidate to escalation of non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) were enrolled. Clinical features and tidal changes in esophageal and nasal pressure were recorded on admission and 24 hours after starting NRS. Correlation between ΔPes and ΔPnos served as primary outcome. The effect of ΔPnos measurements on respiratory rate and ΔPes was also assessed. Results. ΔPes and ΔPnos were strongly correlated at admission (R2=0.88, p<0.001) and 24 hours apart (R2=0.94, p<0.001). The nasal plug insertion and the mouth closure required for ΔPnos measurement did not result in significant change of respiratory rate and ΔPes. The correlation between measures at 24 hours remained significant even after splitting the study population according to the type of NRS (high-flow nasal cannulas [R2=0.79, p<0.001] or noninvasive ventilation [R2=0.95, p<0.001]). Conclusions. In a cohort of patients with ARF, nasal pressure swings did not alter respiratory mechanics in the short term and were highly correlated with esophageal pressure swings during spontaneous tidal breathing. ΔPnos might warrant further investigation as a measure of inspiratory effort in patients with ARF.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To determine whether the duration of respiratory distress symptoms in severe COVID-19 pneumonia affects the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational multicentre cohort study of patients hospitalised in five COVID-19-designated ICUs of the University Hospitals of Emilia-Romagna Region. Patients included were adults with pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 with PaO2/FiO2 ratio <300 mmHg, respiratory distress symptoms, and need for mechanical ventilation (invasive or non-invasive). Exclusion criteria were an uncertain time of respiratory distress, end-of-life decision, and mechanical respiratory support before hospital admission. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We analysed 171 patients stratified into tertiles according to respiratory distress duration (distress time, DT) before application of mechanical ventilation support. The rate of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation was significantly different (p < 0.001) among the tertiles: 17/57 patients in the shortest duration, 29/57 in the intermediate duration, and 40/57 in the longest duration. The respiratory distress time significantly increased the risk of invasive ventilation in the univariate analysis (OR 5.5 [CI 2.48-12.35], p = 0.003). Multivariable regression analysis confirmed this association (OR 10.7 [CI 2.89-39.41], p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes (mortality and hospital stay) did not show significant differences between DT tertiles. DISCUSSION: Albeit preliminary and retrospective, our data raised the hypothesis that the duration of respiratory distress symptoms may play a role in COVID-19 patients' need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, our observations suggested that specific strategies may be directed towards identifying and managing early symptoms of respiratory distress, regardless of the levels of hypoxemia and the severity of the dyspnoea itself.
ABSTRACT
The inodilator levosimendan, in clinical use for over two decades, has been the subject of extensive clinical and experimental evaluation in various clinical settings beyond its principal indication in the management of acutely decompensated chronic heart failure. Critical care and emergency medicine applications for levosimendan have included postoperative settings, septic shock, and cardiogenic shock. As the experience in these areas continues to expand, an international task force of experts from 15 countries (Austria, Belgium, China, Croatia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the USA) reviewed and appraised the latest additions to the database of levosimendan use in critical care, considering all the clinical studies, meta-analyses, and guidelines published from September 2019 to November 2021. Overall, the authors of this opinion paper give levosimendan a “should be considered” recommendation in critical care and emergency medicine settings, with different levels of evidence in postoperative settings, septic shock, weaning from mechanical ventilation, weaning from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiogenic shock, and Takotsubo syndrome, in all cases when an inodilator is needed to restore acute severely reduced left or right ventricular ejection fraction and overall haemodynamic balance, and also in the presence of renal dysfunction/failure.
ABSTRACT
Background: A large global effort is ongoing to develop vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19. While there is accumulating information on the antibody response against SARS-CoV-2, less is known about the SARS-CoV-2 antigens that are targeted by CD8 T cells. Such knowledge will be of high value to gain fundamental insights into the antigenic landscape of SARS-CoV-2 recognized by CD8 T cells, to develop tool allowing focused analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell responses directly ex vivo, and to understand whether current vaccine designs are covering the CD8 T cell recognized antigens. Methods: To address this issue, we have analyzed samples from 18 COVID-19 patients for CD8 T cell recognition of 500 predicted SARS-CoV-2-derived epitopes restricted to 10 common HLA-A and HLA-B alleles. For each HLA allele, the top 50 epitopes were selected based on predicted binding affinity and likelihood of successful proteasomal processing. To probe for CD8 T cell recognition of the selected epitope-HLA complexes, we made use of our in-house technology based on multiplexing of peptide HLA (pHLA) multimers conjugated to fluorescent dyes. Results: In addition to previous studies showing CD8 T cell reactivity towards epitopes derived from the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, we have identified several CD8 T cell recognized epitopes derived from the ORF1ab, including one epitope displaying clear immunodominant properties across patients positive for HLA-A*01:01. Investigation of the functional status of part of the identified responses (including 4 responses specific for the immunodominant epitope) revealed that the T cell responses were highly dysfunctional. In addition the SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8 T cell responses displayed an increased expression of NKG2A in comparison with bulk CD8 T cells, which may explain their dysfunctional state. Conclusions: Our data suggest that part of the ORF1ab encodes multiple CD8 T cell antigens including one immunodominant epitope. Noteworthy these epitopes were derived from a part of the viral genome that is not included in the majority of vaccine candidates in development, and this may potentially influence their clinical activity and safety profile. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
Background: The use of cytokine-blocking agents has been proposed to modulate the inflammatory response in patients with COVID-19. Tocilizumab and anakinra were included in the local protocol as an optional treatment in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by SARS-CoV-2 infection. This cohort study evaluated the effects of therapy with cytokine blocking agents on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation and admitted to intensive care unit. Methods: The association between therapy with tocilizumab or anakinra and in-hospital mortality was assessed in consecutive adult COVID-19 patients admitted to our ICU with moderate to severe ARDS. The association was evaluated by comparing patients who received to those who did not receive tocilizumab or anakinra and by using different multivariable Cox models adjusted for variables related to poor outcome, for the propensity to be treated with tocilizumab or anakinra and after patient matching. Results: Sixty-six patients who received immunotherapy (49 tocilizumab, 17 anakinra) and 28 patients who did not receive immunotherapy were included. The in-hospital crude mortality was 30,3% in treated patients and 50% in non-treated (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.56-1.05, p=0.069). The adjusted Cox model showed an association between therapy with immunotherapy and in-hospital mortality (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.83, p=0.015). This protective effect was further confirmed in the analysis adjusted for propensity score, in the propensity-matched cohort and in the cohort of patients with invasive mechanical ventilation within 2 hours after ICU admission. Conclusions: Although important limitations, our study showed that cytokine-blocking agents seem to be safe and to improve survival in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU with ARDS and the need for mechanical ventilation.
ABSTRACT
While there is accumulating evidence on the antibody response against SARS-CoV-2, we are only beginning toacquire knowledge regarding the SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8 T-cell response. Therefore, it is an urgent matter to gaina deeper insight into the virus specific CD8 T-cell response to both assist vaccine design and provide tools toevaluate the vaccine-induced T-cell responses. To address this issue, we have analyzed samples from 20 COVID-19 patients for CD8 T-cell recognition of 500 predicted SARS-CoV-2-derived epitopes restricted to 10 of the mostcommon HLA-A and HLA-B alleles. For each HLA allele, the top 50 epitopes were selected based on predictedbinding affinity and likelihood of successful proteasomal processing. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 epitope predictionsshared by the science community were considered. To probe for CD8 T-cell recognition of the selected epitopes, wemade use of our in-house technology based on multiplexing of peptide HLA (pHLA) multimers conjugated tofluorescent dyes. Our data demonstrated that CD8 T-cell reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 was common. Remarkably, a substantial fraction of the observed CD8 T-cell responses were directed towards the ORF1ab polyprotein 1ab.These CD8 T-cell responses were frequently of a profound magnitude. In particular, a CD8 T-cell response towardsa potentially immunodominant epitope (TTDPSFLGRY) restricted to the HLA-A∗01:01 allele was found in all patientspositive for this allele. Interestingly, the fraction of SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8 T cells expressing the inhibitoryreceptor NKG2A was higher as compared to bulk CD8 T cells. In conclusion, the fact that a major part of theidentified SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8 T-cell response is directed against a part of the viral genome that is notincluded in the majority of vaccine candidates currently in development may potentially influence their clinical activityand toxicity profile.